Estill v. Shelley

Supreme Court of Alabama
Estill v. Shelley, 2 Port. 185 (Ala. 1835)
Hitchcock

Estill v. Shelley

Opinion of the Court

By Mr. Justice Hitchcock :

This is an action of trespass, vi et armis, for taking and carrying off a slave, the property of the plaintiff. The declaration is in the common form, but *186the blanks, as to the time of committing of the alleged trespass, are not filled up; for this, there is a general demurrer. This defect is cured by the sta^ tute of amendments, which considers all such defects as amended.a

The judgment, must, therefore, be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Aik. Dig.266.

Reference

Full Case Name
ESTILL versus SHELLEY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published