Dunn v. Clement
Dunn v. Clement
Opinion of the Court
— Contracts are construed and governed by the law of the place where they are to be performed. The declaration states that the note was made “in Kemper County, Mississippiand as it was not stated that it was not to be performed there, the legal inference is, that it was to be performed where it was made. (Hamach v. Andrews, 9 Porter 10) It is however, insisted that we must presume “ Kemper County, Mississippi,” is the name of some place in the State of Alabama. It is true, that it is not stated that it was in the State of Mississippi, but we cannot close our eyes to the fact, that such is the case, and must understand it as all the rest of the world would, to mean the State of Mississippi.
In the case cited from, 1 Alabama Reports, New Series, we
For this error, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DUNN v. CLEMENT
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published