Supreme Court of Alabama, 1847

Whitehurst v. Ward

Whitehurst v. Ward
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 15, 1847 · Goldthwaite
12 Ala. 264

Counsel

Jackson, for. the plaintiff in error,, No counsel appeared for the defendant,

Whitehurst v. Ward

Opinion of the Court

GOLDTHWAITE, J.

The en'or in this case is clear. The want of probable cause is the essential ingredient in a malicious prosecution, and if the fact is in accordance with the charge, or if the prosecutor had probable cause to believe it to be so, this is a sufficient answer to the action. To this effect are all the text books and decided cases. [3 Steph. Ni. Pri. 2278, and cases there cited.]

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.