Hogan v. Reynolds
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hardy v. McMullan (Ala. 1989)
- Cameron v. Gunter (Ala. Civ. App. 1981)
- Heise v. Rosow, No. Cv 97 485030 (May 10, 1999) (Connecticut Superior Court 1999)
- Stewart v. Jones (Ala. 1993)
- Holder v. Brooks (Ala. 1954)
- Hart v. Harrell (Tex. App. 1929)
- Zimmerman v. Gaumer (Ind. 1899)
- Montgomery v. Vickery (Ind. 1887)
- National Bank v. Cushing (Vt. 1881)
- Preslar v. Stallworth (Ala. 1861)
- Smith v. Harrison (Ala. 1859)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
β The case of Bartlett & Waring v. Lang,
The rule established by the case of Bartlett & Waring v. Lang, may be thus stated: If a judgment is paid by one who β is a principal in the debt, and, as such, is bound to pay, he cannot, by obtaining an assignment of the judgment, keep it alive in order to coerce payment from his co-principal; and we cannot permit him to do, in the name of another, what he would not be allowed to do in-his own.
Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.