Gill v. Downs
Gill v. Downs
26 Ala. 670
Gill v. Downs
Opinion of the Court
—The only error assigned is, that the court refused the motion to quash the attachment. Such refusal cannot be questioned on error : neither is a motion to quash the remedy in such cases.—Jordan v. Hazard, 10 Ala. 221-6. But, if it were, the defendant waived it, by failing to make it at the first term of the court, and. by afterwards appearing and pleading to the merits.—Burroughs v. Wright, 3 Ala. 43.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.