Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator
Supreme Court of Alabama
Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator, 35 Ala. 327 (Ala. 1859)
Walker
Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator
Opinion of the Court
The bill of exceptions, after a statement of evidence, says, that “ thereupon" the court rejected the appellant’s claim. Adopting the construction less favorable to the appellant, we cannot regard this as an assertion that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence upon which the court acted; and consequently, we cannot affirm that there was error in the rejection oí the appellant’s claim. — Keep v. Kelly & Levin, 29 Ala. 322 ; Bradley v. Andress, 30 Ala. 80 ; Lovett v. Chisolm, 30 Ala. 88; Stein v. Feltheimer, 31 Ala. 57.
The decree of the court below is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SOUTHERN MUTUAL INS. CO. v. HOLCOMBE'S ADMINISTRATOR
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published