Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859

Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator

Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 15, 1859 · Walker
35 Ala. 327

Southern Mutual Ins. v. Holcombe's Administrator

Opinion of the Court

A. J. WALKER, O. J.

The bill of exceptions, after a statement of evidence, says, that “ thereupon" the court rejected the appellant’s claim. Adopting the construction less favorable to the appellant, we cannot regard this as an assertion that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence upon which the court acted; and consequently, we cannot affirm that there was error in the rejection oí the appellant’s claim. — Keep v. Kelly & Levin, 29 Ala. 322 ; Bradley v. Andress, 30 Ala. 80 ; Lovett v. Chisolm, 30 Ala. 88; Stein v. Feltheimer, 31 Ala. 57.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.