It seems to us that ;tbe libel is fatally defective, in omitting to show that tbe bbebant rendered tbe services, for wbicb be sues, in some one of tbe capacities specified in tbe latter clause of section 2692 of tbe Code, or that tbe services were rendered for one of tbe objects specified in tbe former clause. "We therefore tbint that tbe court erred in not bolding tbe bbel insufficient, and in proceeding to render judgment upon it,

Reversed and remanded.