Supreme Court of Alabama, 1871

Winnemore v. Mathews

Winnemore v. Mathews
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided January 15, 1871 · Saffold
45 Ala. 449
Winnemore v. Mathews

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

The summons was not signed by the clerk, and the judgment was by default. The summons must be signed by-the clerk, and it is his signature which gives it validity. — -Rev. Code, §§ 2559, 2560; Stone v. Harris, Minor’s Rep. 32; Browder v. Gaston & Wellborn, 30 Ala. 677; Costley v. Driver, present term.

The complaint does not contain a substantial cause of action. By the omission to state who did the work, the plaintiff might recover money to which he had no claim whatever, and another is entitled.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.