Fulglram v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Alabama
Fulglram v. Roberts, 75 Ala. 341 (Ala. 1883)
Stone

Fulglram v. Roberts

Opinion of the Court

STONE, J.

The present suit was brought in January, 1881, for an alleged injury committed before that time. In Roberts v. Pippen, at this term [ante p. 103], we ruled that neither the act β€œto amend section 2681 of the Code,” (Pamph. Acts,1880-1, p. 31), nor the act to amend said act, approved February 5th, 1883, (Pamph. Acts, p. 38), affected the rights of parties, circumstanced as these were. The result of the ruling is, to require a reversal of this case in many particulars, notably, in the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the original complaint. The case must be tried without reference to either of those amenda-tory statutes. We need not particularize the errors committed.

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Status
Published