Knowles v. State
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wilbanks v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1962)
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R. (Ala. 1913)
- Johnson v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1912)
- Hope v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1912)
- Black v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
- State v. Good (W. Va. 1904)
- Norille v. State (Ala. 1901)
- Brantley v. State (Ala. 1890)
- Boyd v. State (Ala. 1889)
- Quillman v. Gurley (Ala. 1888)
- Wynn v. State (Ala. 1888)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Under the rule announced in Bell v. The State, 75 Ala. 25, this court has no jurisdiction and must therefore decline to review the finding of the County Court of Wilcox county upon the testimony set out in the record. See also Calloway v. The State, 75 Ala. 56; Acts, 1880-81, p. 295.
The indictment is for selling intoxicating liquor in violation of a prohibitory liquor law, approved December 12, 1882, and made applicable to the county of Wilcox. — Acts 1882-83, pp. 254-255.
The court, in our judgment, erred in excluding the state
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.