Howard-Harrison Iron Co. v. Tillman
Howard-Harrison Iron Co. v. Tillman
Opinion of the Court
The judgment against the garnishee (appellant) was clearly erroneous. It answered denying indebtedness. Plaintiff contested the answer, and an issue was made up and tried by the court without a jury. The evidence is without a shadow of conflict that the garnishee was not, in any manner whatever, indebted to the defendant, Nicholson, and had no goods, money or effects belonging to him in its possession. One Johnson, the employer of Nicholson and other hands, procured O. W. Harrison,. as an act of accommodation, to make out his pay-roll for him and pay off his hands. Harrison was, at that time, cashier of the garnishee. The garnishee owed Johnson a sum of money, and when the time came for Harrison, as cashier, to pay it, Johnson made the request to him, as above stated, to make out his pay-roll and pay off his hands for him, out of the money coming to him, Johnson. Harrison did as requested, and handed to Nicholson, and the other hands, the sums owing them, respectively, by Johnson. We suppose, from the argument of appellee’s counsel, that the court acted upon the
If it had beem otherwise properly rendered, the amount of the judgment is incorrect. The plaintiff’s judgment against Nicholson was for $5.60 and costs, Aug. 12, 1891. The judgment rendered by the circuit court against the garnishee was for $15110 and all costs.
The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a judgment will be here rendered discharging the garnishee . ' f
Reversed and rendered.
Reference
- Status
- Published