Williams v. Coosa Manufacturing Co.
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hicks v. Allred (Ala. 1967)
- Middleton v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. (Ala. 1934)
- Hale v. Cox (Ala. 1930)
- Jackson v. Ariton Banking Co. (Ala. 1926)
- Alabama Chemical Co. v. Hall (Ala. 1926)
- Globe Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Jones (Ala. 1925)
- Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co. (Ala. 1918)
- Smith v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Crosby (Ala. 1915)
- Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co. (Ala. 1910)
- Climax Lumber Co. v. Bay City Mach. Wks. (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Nowlin (Ala. 1908)
- North Birmingham Lumber Co. v. Sims & White (Ala. 1908)
- Southern Railway Co. v. Kirsch (Ala. 1907)
- Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. Moore (Ala. 1906)
- Ferrell v. City of Opelika (Ala. 1905)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
This action was brought by the appellant; Lon Williams, against the Coosa Manufacturing Company, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant. There were demurrers interposed to the complaint. These demurrers were sustained, and the plaintiff declining to plead further, judgment was rendered for the defendant. The assignment of error in the case ivas as follows: “Comes the plaintiff, and for assignment of error says that the court erred in sustaining demurrers, and each of them, to plaintiff’s complaint from 1 to 12, inclusive, set out on pages 7 and 8 of record.”
It is held by the court that this assignment of error was too general to be considered, and that it does not conform to Bule 1 of Supreme Court Practice.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.