Moss v. State
Moss v. State
140 Ala. 199
Moss v. State
Opinion of the Court
This record discloses no judgment of guilt, but only an entry of what seems to have been intended as a confessed judgment for the fine and costs following upon a mere verdict of guilt. Upon the authority of Thomason v. State, 70 Ala. 20, which was referred to approvingly in Wright v. State, 103 Ala. 95, it must be held that the entry does not constitute a final judgment such as will support an appeal, and following the course
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.