Houston v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Houston v. State, 153 Ala. 61 (Ala. 1907)
45 So. 228; 1907 Ala. LEXIS 203
Anderson, Dowdell, McClellan, Tyson

Houston v. State

Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.

The affidavit was sufficient. — Section 4729 of the Code of 1896. The description of the thing obtained as “two dollars” was sufficient. Form 48, Code of 1896. Nor was it necessary for the affidavit to aver whether the Ivy Leaf Company was a firm or corporation, as it was not the party averred to have *63been injured. — Headley v. State, 106 Ala. 109, 17 South. 714.

The judgment of the criminal court is affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Dowdell and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published