Rogers v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Rogers v. State, 154 Ala. 75 (Ala. 1907)
45 So. 221; 1907 Ala. LEXIS 658
Anderson, Haralson, McClellan, Tyson
Rogers v. State
Opinion of the Court
The affidavit on which the defendant was tried was sufficient in its designation of him by initials; his name being averred to be unknown to the affiant. The plea was not guilty, and there was no evidence adduced tending to refute the averment of the affidavit that his name was unknown.- — Winter v. State. 90 Ala. 637, 8 South. 556. There was testimony intro
No error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published