Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908

Southern Timber & Investment Co. v. Creagh

Southern Timber & Investment Co. v. Creagh
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided February 4, 1908 · Denson, Haralson, Simpson, Tyson
154 Ala. 283; 45 So. 666; 1908 Ala. LEXIS 539

Southern Timber & Investment Co. v. Creagh

Opinion of the Court

TYSON, C. J.

There are two reasons why the judgment appealed from must be reversed:

The first is: It is shown by the record that the judgment is against a non-resident, without appearance or plea by defendant, and it is not shown that proof was made to the court of facts requisite to constitute notice by publication, as required by section 531, Code 1896.— Diston v. Hood, 83 Ala. 331, 3 South. 746; Trammell v. Guy, 151 Ala. 311, 44 South. 37; Southern Timber & Investment Co. v. Frank Poe, 153 Ala. 595, 45 South. 205.

The second is: The judgment is in personam, instead of in rem. When the service is not personal, attachment proceedings being in rem, no valid personal judgment can he rendered. — De Arman v. Massey, 151 Ala. 659, 44 South. 688.

Reversed and remanded.

Haralson, Simpson, and Denson, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.