Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Supreme Court of Alabama /

1909

669 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.

  • Ritch v. Kilby Frog & Switch Co. 51 So. 377, (Ala. 1909)
  • Whaley v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. 51 So. 419, (Ala. 1909)
  • Western Union Telegraph. Co. v. Saunders 51 So. 176, (Ala. 1909)
  • Watkins v. Carter 51 So. 318, (Ala. 1909)
  • Crausby v. Crausby 51 So. 229, (Ala. 1909)
  • City of Troy v. Western Union Tel. Co. 51 So. 523, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Iron Equipment Co. v. Holmes L. Co. 51 So. 531, (Ala. 1909)
  • City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co. 51 So. 159, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hudgens v. Creola Lumber Co. 51 So. 525, (Ala. 1909)
  • Kreulhaus v. City of Birmingham 51 So. 297, (Ala. 1909)
  • Williams v. City of Talladega 51 So. 330, (Ala. 1909)
  • Elder v. Jones 51 So. 313, (Ala. 1909)
  • Pope v. State 51 So. 521, (Ala. 1909)
  • Alabama Steel & Wire Co. v. Thompson 52 So. 75, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tobler v. Pioneer Mining & Mfg. Co. 52 So. 86, (Ala. 1909)
  • Weatherly v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway 51 So. 959, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham & Atlantic Railway Co. v. Mattison 52 So. 49, (Ala. 1909)
  • McKinney v. Commissioner's Court 52 So. 756, (Ala. 1909)
  • Converse Bridge Co. v. Geneva County 53 So. 196, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tyson v. Austill 53 So. 263, (Ala. 1909)
  • Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Brown 48 So. 48, (Ala. 1909)
  • Mobile Light & Railway Co. v. McKay 50 So. 1035, (Ala. 1909)
  • Martin v. Union Spring's & Northern Railway Co. 50 So. 897, (Ala. 1909)
  • Ganus & Co. v. Tew 50 So. 1000, (Ala. 1909)
  • Oliver v. Williams 50 So. 937, (Ala. 1909)
  • Davis v. Anderson 50 So. 1002, (Ala. 1909)
  • King v. Hill & Shafer Co. 51 So. 15, (Ala. 1909)
  • Sanders v. Williams 50 So. 893, (Ala. 1909)
  • Johnson v. New Enterprise Co. 50 So. 911, (Ala. 1909)
  • Latham v. Boyles 50 So. 1001, (Ala. 1909)
  • DeLeon v. Walters 50 So. 934, (Ala. 1909)
  • Cook v. Phonoharp Co. 50 So. 1021, (Ala. 1909)
  • Fleming v. Lunsford 50 So. 921, (Ala. 1909)
  • Johnson v. Linton 51 So. 32, (Ala. 1909)
  • Dickens v. Murray & Peppers 50 So. 1019, (Ala. 1909)
  • Mobile, J. &. K. C. R. R. v. Hawkins 51 So. 37, (Ala. 1909)
  • Lewis Land & Lumber Co. v. Interstate L. Co. 50 So. 1036, (Ala. 1909)
  • Parsons Lumber Co. v. West-Steagall G. & M. Co. 50 So. 1034, (Ala. 1909)
  • Penton v. Williams 51 So. 35, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. Oden 51 So. 240, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gaines v. Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co. 51 So. 238, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. Weathers 51 So. 303, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Walker 51 So. 169, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Holland 51 So. 365, (Ala. 1909)
  • Williams v. Anniston Electric & Gas Co. 51 So. 385, (Ala. 1909)
  • Whitmore v. Alabama Consolidated C. & I. Co. 51 So. 397, (Ala. 1909)
  • Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Hudson 51 So. 399, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Street 51 So. 306, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Hyde 51 So. 368, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Crawford 51 So. 340, (Ala. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 … 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑