1909
669 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.
- Webb v. Reagin 49 So. 580, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Baker 49 So. 755, (Ala. 1909)
- McMillan v. Manistee Mill Co. 49 So. 685, (Ala. 1909)
- Early v. Fitzpatrick 49 So. 686, (Ala. 1909)
- Anniston Cordage Co. v. W. U. Tel. Co. 49 So. 770, (Ala. 1909)
- Crowder v. Doe ex dem. Tennessee C. I. & R. R. Co. 50 So. 230, (Ala. 1909)
- Basenberg v. Lawrence 49 So. 771, (Ala. 1909)
- Whisenant v. Hybart 49 So. 760, (Ala. 1909)
- Atlanta & Birmingham Air Line Ry. v. Wood 49 So. 426, (Ala. 1909)
- Ex parte Dickens 50 So. 218, (Ala. 1909)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Huffstutler 50 So. 146, (Ala. 1909)
- Floyd v. Wilson 50 So. 122, (Ala. 1909)
- Donnelly v. House 49 So. 324, (Ala. 1909)
- O'Briant v. O'Briant 49 So. 317, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Express Co. v. Saks 49 So. 392, (Ala. 1909)
- A. G. S. Ry. Co. v. McCleskey 49 So. 433, (Ala. 1909)
- Dial v. State 49 So. 230, (Ala. 1909)
- State v. Bley 50 So. 263, (Ala. 1909)
- Bennett v. State 49 So. 296, (Ala. 1909)
- Seawright v. State 49 So. 325, (Ala. 1909)
- McCain v. State 49 So. 361, (Ala. 1909)
- State v. Stracener 49 So. 301, (Ala. 1909)
- Troup v. State 49 So. 332, (Ala. 1909)
- Strickland & Co. v. Lesesne & Ladd 49 So. 233, (Ala. 1909)
- Wallace v. Hodges 49 So. 312, (Ala. 1909)
- Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Curry 49 So. 319, (Ala. 1909)
- Davis v. Vandiver & Co. 49 So. 318, (Ala. 1909)
- East Birmingham Realty Co. v. Birmingham Machine & Foundry Co. 49 So. 448, (Ala. 1909)
- Russell v. Bell 49 So. 314, (Ala. 1909)
- Enslen v. Allen 49 So. 430, (Ala. 1909)
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. Gandy 49 So. 369, (Ala. 1909)
- Horton v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. 49 So. 423, (Ala. 1909)
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Arnold 50 So. 293, (Ala. 1909)
- Gray v. Strickland 50 So. 152, (Ala. 1909)
- Julian v. Guarantee Life I. 49 So. 234, (Ala. 1909)
- Finklea v. Farish 49 So. 366, (Ala. 1909)
- Cochran v. Purser 49 So. 353, (Ala. 1909)
- Brent v. Baldwin 49 So. 343, (Ala. 1909)
- Railroad Commission v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co. 49 So. 237, (Ala. 1909)
- Richards v. Shepherd 49 So. 251, (Ala. 1909)
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Scruggs & Echols 49 So. 399, (Ala. 1909)
- A. G. S. R. R. v. Hanbury 49 So. 467, (Ala. 1909)
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Bowen 49 So. 305, (Ala. 1909)
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Green 49 So. 301, (Ala. 1909)
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Dothan Mule Co. 49 So. 243, (Ala. 1909)
- Leland v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 49 So. 252, (Ala. 1909)
- Richards v. Burgin 49 So. 294, (Ala. 1909)
- Sloss-Sheffield S. &. I. Co. v. Dorman 49 So. 242, (Ala. 1909)
- Montgomery Lodge No. 596, B. P. O. E. v. Massie 49 So. 231, (Ala. 1909)
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Hellner 49 So. 297, (Ala. 1909)