Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Supreme Court of Alabama /

1909

669 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1909.

  • Chandler v. Traub 49 So. 241, (Ala. 1909)
  • Vadeboncoeur v. Hannon 49 So. 292, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tennessee C. I. & R. R. v. Wise 49 So. 253, (Ala. 1909)
  • Crabtree v. Nolan 49 So. 309, (Ala. 1909)
  • Traub v. Fabian 49 So. 240, (Ala. 1909)
  • Cushman v. Commissioner's Court 49 So. 311, (Ala. 1909)
  • Stephens v. Middlebrooks 49 So. 321, (Ala. 1909)
  • Roquemore v. Vulcan Iron Works 49 So. 389, (Ala. 1909)
  • Cullman County v. Blounty County 49 So. 315, (Ala. 1909)
  • United Order of Golden Cross v. Hooser 49 So. 354, (Ala. 1909)
  • Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Proctor 49 So. 377, (Ala. 1909)
  • Green & Gay v. Wright, Williams & Wadley 49 So. 320, (Ala. 1909)
  • South & North Alabama Railroad v. Gray 49 So. 347, (Ala. 1909)
  • Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Champion 49 So. 415, (Ala. 1909)
  • B. F. Roden Grocery Co. v. McAfee 49 So. 402, (Ala. 1909)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Seale 49 So. 323, (Ala. 1909)
  • Alabama City G. & A. Co. v. Brady 49 So. 351, (Ala. 1909)
  • Rutledge v. Rowland 49 So. 461, (Ala. 1909)
  • Alabama Great Southern Ry. v. Brock 49 So. 453, (Ala. 1909)
  • Carlisle v. Alabama Great Southern Railway 52 So. 341, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tallassee Falls Mfg. Co. v. First National Bank 49 So. 246, (Ala. 1909)
  • Stanfill v. Johnson 49 So. 223, (Ala. 1909)
  • Rollings v. State 49 So. 329, (Ala. 1909)
  • Frazer v. State 49 So. 245, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gate City Cotton Mills v. Rosenau Hosiery Mills 49 So. 228, (Ala. 1909)
  • Lawrence v. Stone 49 So. 376, (Ala. 1909)
  • Clisby v. Clisby 49 So. 445, (Ala. 1909)
  • City of Bessemer v. Eidge 50 So. 270, (Ala. 1909)
  • Didlake v. Roden Grocery Co. 49 So. 384, (Ala. 1909)
  • Dumas v. State 49 So. 224, (Ala. 1909)
  • Crone & Co. v. Long & Son 49 So. 227, (Ala. 1909)
  • Brown v. French 49 So. 255, (Ala. 1909)
  • Mobile & Ohio R. R. v. Glover 159 Ala. 671, (Ala. 1909)
  • Brewer v. State 49 So. 336, (Ala. 1909)
  • Anderson v. State 49 So. 460, (Ala. 1909)
  • Gillespie v. McClesky 49 So. 362, (Ala. 1909)
  • Max J. Winkler Brokerage Co. v. Courson 49 So. 341, (Ala. 1909)
  • Thompson v. N. C. & St. L. Railway 49 So. 340, (Ala. 1909)
  • Tuskegee Land & Security Co. v. Birmingham Realty Co. 49 So. 278, (Ala. 1909)
  • St. L. & S. F. R. R. v. Pearce 49 So. 247, (Ala. 1909)
  • Farmers Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Melton & Stuart 49 So. 225, (Ala. 1909)
  • Turner v. State 49 So. 304, (Ala. 1909)
  • Smith v. Woolf 49 So. 395, (Ala. 1909)
  • Bohanan v. Thomas 49 So. 308, (Ala. 1909)
  • Coleman v. Kiernan 49 So. 230, (Ala. 1909)
  • Price v. Dennis 49 So. 248, (Ala. 1909)
  • State ex rel. Gipson v. Pearson 49 So. 236, (Ala. 1909)
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Greene 49 So. 404, (Ala. 1909)
  • Hagan v. Commissioner's Court 49 So. 417, (Ala. 1909)
  • Birmingham Railway L. & P. Co. v. Jung 49 So. 434, (Ala. 1909)
« Prev 1 … 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑