Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910

Hester v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided December 1, 1910 · Dowdell, Mayfield, McClellan, Simpson

169 Ala. 490; 53 So. 1009; 1910 Ala. LEXIS 231

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Irby v. Kaigler (Ala. Ct. App. 1912)
Turner v. Thornton (Ala. 1915)
Collins v. Vaughn Realty Co. (Ala. 1928)
J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Pinckard & Lay (Ala. Ct. App. 1918)
Clancy v. Taylor (Ala. Ct. App. 1915)
Owens v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1914)
Higdon v. Warrant Warehouse Co. (Ala. Ct. App. 1913)
Lucas v. Mays (Ala. Ct. App. 1911)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, J.

The bill of exceptions expressly purports to he, as it is, nothing other than the steno*491graphic report of the trial below. It is, hence, constructed. in patent violation of rule 32 of circuit court practice (Civ. Code 1907, p. 1526). It will be stricken. —Gassenheimer & Co. v. Marietta Co., 127 Ala. 183, 28 South. 564; Sou. Ry. Co. v. Jackson, 133 Ala. 384, 31 South. 988; Woodward Iron Co. v. Herndon, 130 Ala. 364, 375, 376, 30 South. 370.

There is no error assigned as upon the record proper, so the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.