Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Alabama /Cases /Supreme Court of Alabama /

1913

476 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1913.

  • Spraggins v. State ex rel. Jefferson County 63 So. 83, (Ala. 1913)
  • Mizell v. State 63 So. 1000, (Ala. 1913)
  • Thomason v. Court of County Commissioners 63 So. 87, (Ala. 1913)
  • Ex parte Shriner 63 So. 69, (Ala. 1913)
  • Ex parte McFerren 63 So. 159, (Ala. 1913)
  • Macon County v. Abercrombie 63 So. 985, (Ala. 1913)
  • Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Beck 64 So. 37, (Ala. 1913)
  • Waldrop v. State 64 So. 80, (Ala. 1913)
  • Railroad Commission v. Alabama Great Southern R. R. 64 So. 13, (Ala. 1913)
  • Shepherd v. Sartain 64 So. 57, (Ala. 1913)
  • Montgomery Light & Traction Co. v. King 65 So. 998, (Ala. 1913)
  • Kansas City M. & B. R. R. v. Stiles 62 So. 734, (Ala. 1913)
  • Hearn v. Court of Co. Com. Blount Co. 62 So. 533, (Ala. 1913)
  • Duncan v. De Yampert 62 So. 673, (Ala. 1913)
  • Louisville & N. R. R. v. Cornelius 62 So. 710, (Ala. 1913)
  • Travis v. L. & N. R. R. 62 So. 851, (Ala. 1913)
  • Hale v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. R. 62 So. 783, (Ala. 1913)
  • Williams v. Williams 62 So. 843, (Ala. 1913)
  • Easterwood v. Lay 62 So. 787, (Ala. 1913)
  • Western Union Tel. Co. v. L. & N. R. R. 184 Ala. 673, (Ala. 1913)
  • Western Union Tel. Co. v. L. & N. R. R. 184 Ala. 674, (Ala. 1913)
  • Burch v. Gaston 62 So. 508, (Ala. 1913)
  • Louisville & N. R. R. v. Williams 62 So. 679, (Ala. 1913)
  • Caldwell v. Caldwell 62 So. 951, (Ala. 1913)
  • Railroad Commission v. Ala. North. Ry. Co. 62 So. 749, (Ala. 1913)
  • Cloverdale Homes v. Town of Cloverdale 62 So. 712, (Ala. 1913)
  • Noble v. Saffold 62 So. 515, (Ala. 1913)
  • Meadows v. State 62 So. 737, (Ala. 1913)
  • McOllister v. State 62 So. 767, (Ala. 1913)
  • Edgar v. State 62 So. 800, (Ala. 1913)
  • Roberson v. State 62 So. 837, (Ala. 1913)
  • Middleton v. Western U. Tel. Co. 62 So. 744, (Ala. 1913)
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Godwin 62 So. 768, (Ala. 1913)
  • Bickley v. Hays 62 So. 767, (Ala. 1913)
  • City of Decatur v. Southern Railway Co. 62 So. 855, (Ala. 1913)
  • Jeffreys v. Jeffreys 62 So. 797, (Ala. 1913)
  • Ely v. Brewer 62 So. 742, (Ala. 1913)
  • Tennison v. State 62 So. 780, (Ala. 1913)
  • Hamil v. Flowers 63 So. 994, (Ala. 1913)
  • Greil Bros. v. City of Montgomery 62 So. 692, (Ala. 1913)
  • Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. King 62 So. 704, (Ala. 1913)
  • Harris v. State 59 So. 205, (Ala. 1913)
  • Edmonds v. Cogsdill 62 So. 691, (Ala. 1913)
  • Conoly v. Harrell 62 So. 511, (Ala. 1913)
  • Romano v. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. 62 So. 677, (Ala. 1913)
  • Frederic v. Wilkins 62 So. 518, (Ala. 1913)
  • Pitts v. Darby 62 So. 523, (Ala. 1913)
  • Roycroft v. Jordan 62 So. 701, (Ala. 1913)
  • Murphy v. McAdory 62 So. 706, (Ala. 1913)
  • Nashville, C. & St. L. Railway v. Crosby 62 So. 889, (Ala. 1913)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 10 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑