This is an action to recover the statutory penalty for failure to enter on the margin of the record the satisfaction of a mortgage. Code, § 4898.. The appellee is the plaintiff, and the appellants the defendants. The court submitted the issues of fact to the jury, whereupon the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants. In response to motion for a new trial based, in substance/ upon* the idea that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, the court awarded a new trial. The rule established in this court is that:

“Decisions granting new trials will not be reviewed, unless the evidence plainly and palpably supports the verdict.” Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 635, 636, 9 South. 738, 740.

.So where a new 'trial is awarded on the stated ground, the question, in the appellate court, is whether the evidence “plainly and palpably” supported the verdict. A careful consideration of the conflicting evidence before the court cannot be here pronounced so strongly, plainly; palpably supportive of the verdict as to justify this court in reversing the action of the court in awarding a new trial.

Affirmed.