1917
630 Supreme Court of Alabama opinions from 1917.
- Traweek v. Hagler 75 So. 156, (Ala. 1917)
- Christopher v. Shockley 75 So. 158, (Ala. 1917)
- Alabama Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Alabama Penny Sav. Bank 76 So. 103, (Ala. 1917)
- Alabama Corn Mills Co. v. Mobile Docks Co. 75 So. 574, (Ala. 1917)
- Birmingham Railway, L. & P. Co. v. Garrett 73 So. 818, (Ala. 1917)
- Dinsmoor v. Thomas 73 So. 820, (Ala. 1917)
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Lanier 73 So. 821, (Ala. 1917)
- Hoover v. Miller 73 So. 817, (Ala. 1917)
- Buckalew v. Lusk 73 So. 917, (Ala. 1917)
- Marbury Lumber Co. v. Lamont 73 So. 923, (Ala. 1917)
- Conn v. Sellers 73 So. 961, (Ala. 1917)
- Ex parte City of Birmingham 74 So. 51, (Ala. 1917)
- Atlantic C. L. Ry. Co. v. Enterprise Cotton Co. 74 So. 232, (Ala. 1917)
- Nance v. Walker 74 So. 339, (Ala. 1917)
- Card v. Cunningham 74 So. 335, (Ala. 1917)
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Boggs 74 So. 337, (Ala. 1917)
- Anders Bros. v. Latimer 73 So. 925, (Ala. 1917)
- Russell v. Stockton 74 So. 225, (Ala. 1917)
- Ralls v. Johnson 75 So. 926, (Ala. 1917)
- McGraw v. Little 73 So. 915, (Ala. 1917)
- Kohlenberg v. Shaw 73 So. 932, (Ala. 1917)
- Belleview Cemetery Co. v. Faulks 73 So. 927, (Ala. 1917)
- Lovelady v. Copeland 73 So. 948, (Ala. 1917)
- Hamilton v. Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co. 73 So. 950, (Ala. 1917)
- Adams v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. 73 So. 999, (Ala. 1917)
- Ex parte Walling 73 So. 1002, (Ala. 1917)
- Wittmeier v. Cranford 73 So. 981, (Ala. 1917)
- Spear v. Ward 74 So. 27, (Ala. 1917)
- Ex parte Davenport 74 So. 1005, (Ala. 1917)
- Oil Well Supply Co. v. West Huntsville C. M. Co. 73 So. 899, (Ala. 1917)