Mack v. State
Mack v. State
77 So. 683; 201 Ala. 269; 1918 Ala. LEXIS 216
(Southern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Penningham v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1930)
- Jiles v. State (Ala. 1929)
- Thomas v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1925)
- Motley v. State (Ala. Ct. App. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appeal in this cause is upon the record proper. There being no bill of exceptions, we cannot review the action of the trial court, therefore, in refusing the written charges requested by the defendant, which are set out in the record. Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 South. 36.
We find no error on the record, and the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.