Rogers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Alabama
Rogers v. Hines, 86 So. 524 (Ala. 1920)
204 Ala. 549
Thomas, Anderson, McClellan, Gardner

Rogers v. Hines

Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.

A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord’s lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find thqt no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord’s lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rogers v. Hines.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published