Shirey v. State
Shirey v. State
Opinion of the Court
The petition for certiorari in this case to the Court of Appeals was filed April 20, 1921.
The appellant, within 15 days after his case was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, made application for a rehearing. It was accompanied by a brief. It contained no certificate of counsel that a copy of such brief had been delivered to opposing counsel. This was necessary. Rule 38, 198 Ala. xiii, 77 South, vii. The record showed no copy of brief was delivered to opposing counsel within the 15 days. The Attorney General made motion to strike the application for rehearing on that ground. It was granted by the Court of Appeals. In this there was no error.' Rule 38 declares:
“No application shall be received or' filed which is not presented in strict compliance with this rule.”
Rule 42 (198 Ala. xiv, 77 South, vii) states:
“The court will not, in term time, nor will the justices thereof in vacation, receive or consider an application for writ of certiorari or other remedial writs or process, for the purpose of revising or reviewing any opinion or decision of the Court of Appeals, unless it appears upon the face of the application that an application had been made to said Court of Appeals for a rehearing of the point or decision complained of and that said application had been decided adversely to the movant. * * * ”
Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ex Parte Shirey. Shirey v. State.
- Cited By
- 11 cases
- Status
- Published