Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921

Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided October 20, 1921 · Anderson, McCLELLAN, Somerville, Thomas
90 So. 871; 206 Ala. 488; 1921 Ala. LEXIS 224 (Southern Reporter)

Steagall v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.

[1] A primary question presented is: Can a party to a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 206 et seq.) appeal from a judgment rendered by the circuit court, or is the sole revisory remedy by certiorari?

[2] The rulings sought to be presented in this court for review by appeal, rather than by certiorari, will not be considered, on the authority of Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 90 South. 803. 2 A question of jurisdiction being presented, and which may not ho waived by consent, the appeal will he dismissed ex mero motu.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ„ concur.
2

Ante, p. 447.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.