Ex Parte Young

Supreme Court of Alabama
Ex Parte Young, 102 So. 369 (Ala. 1924)
212 Ala. 303; 1924 Ala. LEXIS 202
Anderson, Somerville, Thomas, Bouldin

Ex Parte Young

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the reviewable points in the original opinion of the Court of Appeals, and find no errors entitling the petitioner to the writ. Ex parte L. & N. R. R. Co., 176 Ala. 631, 58 So. 315; Postal Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

While not committing this court to the soundness of all that is said in the opinion of the Court of Appeals in response to the petition for certiorari to contradict the record, we are of the opinion that the denial of the writ sought after the case was submitted and decided was largely within the discretion of the Court of Appeals.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ex Parte Ernest YOUNG. in Re Ernest YOUNG v. the STATE
Status
Published