The appeal in this case is oh the record alone, without a bill of exceptions. It is stated in brief of counsel for appellant that the errors assigned and here insisted upon are “that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.”

Under decisions many times repeated, we cannot review this action of the trial court in the absence of a bill of exceptions showing that an exception was duly reserved to the ruling. The mere.incorporation of an exeep *264 tion in the record proper is not sufficient. Akin v. Chancy Bros., etc., Co., 207 Ala. 523, 93 So. 408; Newell Contr. Co. v. Glenn, 214 Ala. 282, 107 So. 801.

As the record stands, we can only affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.