This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of murder in the second degree, under indictment charging first degree murder. The order for special venire for the trial of defendant’s case was in all substantial respects the same as that considered by this court in Spooney v. State, 115 So. 308, and the same question presented in like manner as in that case. The holding therefore is conclusive here. Following that authority, the judgment must be here reversed for the action of the court in denying the motion, seasonably made, to quash the venire.

In view of a retrial of the cause, we find only one other question needs consideration.

It is not essential to the validity of an indictment that it should have been prepared or signed by the solicitor. Prince v. State, 140 Ala. 158, 37 So. 171. The fact, therefore, that the indictment appears in the record as having been signed by “E. W. Norton, Acting Solicitor of the Third Judicial Circuit,” without the record further showing the authority to so act, presents no reversible error. It may be added also that no question concerning this matter was presented in the court below.

It results that, from the action of the court upon the matter of the venire, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.