King v. Coffee

Supreme Court of Alabama
King v. Coffee, 131 So. 796 (Ala. 1930)
222 Ala. 248; 1930 Ala. LEXIS 530
Foster, Anderson, Gardner, Bouldin

King v. Coffee

Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, J.

This is a statutory suit to quiet the title of certain land specially described. The only issue is whether a deed, therein referred to, conveyed the title to complainant and his wife jointly, and, also, the effect upon the title of a suit by complainant to reform the deed, resulting in a decree denying relief and dismissing the cause.

After a decree against complainant’s contention was entered in this cause, he died. There has been entered an order of revival in the name of his executrix, and as such she has *249 appealed. In a companion case we treated the same questions as are here involved. 131 So. 792. 1 The result of this case is controlled by what was there said. Based upon that one, we conclude that appellees, heirs of Lucy S. King, deceased, have no right or title to or interest or claim in the land described in the bill in this cause. A decree will be here entered to that effect.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
1

Ante, p. 245.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mamie C. KING, Executrix, Etc. v. T. J. COFFEE Et Al.
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published