Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932

In re Opinions of Justices

In re Opinions of Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided August 31, 1932 · Anderson, Bouldin, Brown, Foster, Gardner, Knight, Thomas
225 Ala. 356; 143 So. 289

In re Opinions of Justices

Opinion of the Court

*359Response of the Justices.

To the Honorable Senate of Alabama:

Replying to your inquiry concerning Senate Bill 51, the undersigned Justices of the Supreme Court of Alabama are of the opinion that the financial scheme therein disclosed is, without reference.to any other provision of the Constitution, violative of section 213 of our State Constitution. In re Opinions of the Justices, 223 Ala. 130, 136 So. 489.

We are of the opinion that the bill here proposed is to be differentiated from the act considered in Alabama State Bridge Corporation et al. v. Smith, 217 Ala. 311, 116 So. 695.

Signed, this the 31st day of August, 1932.

JOHN C. ANDERSON, Chief Justice. LUCIEN D. GARDNER, Associate Justice. WILLIAM H. THOMAS, Associate Justice. VIRGIL BOULDIN, Associate Justice. JOEL B. BROWN, Associate Justice. A. B. FOSTER, Associate Justice. . THOMAS E. KNIGHT, Associate Justice.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.