Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided March 29, 1934 · Foster, Anderson, Gardner, Bouldin
153 So. 918; 228 Ala. 699 (Southern Reporter)
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The undisputed facts of this ease show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 224 Ala. 644, 141 So. 562; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Batty, 227 Ala. 50, 148 So. 811; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Harden, 227 Ala. 700, 150 So. 921.

No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those eases.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.