Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935

Daniel v. Ormand

Daniel v. Ormand
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided June 27, 1935 · Brown, Anderson, Thomas, Bouldin
163 So. 362; 231 Ala. 10; 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326 (Southern Reporter)

Daniel v. Ormand

Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506, 80 So. 794; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409, 32 So. 10; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70, 82 So. 28; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521, 93 So. 395.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.