Poyner v. Houston County
Poyner v. Houston County
Opinion of the Court
Section 281 of the Constitution forbidding any decrease in the salary of a public" officer during the term for which he was elected or appointed, as well as section 150, specially relating to judicial officers, is for the protection of the incumbent.
An appointee to fill an unexpired term takes the salary prescribed by law at the time of his appointment. State v. Gunter, 170 Ala. 165, 176, 54 So. 283.
Judge Halstead, appointed in October, 1934, to fill an unexpired term, took the, salary fixed by the Act of 1933, Gen. Acts, Extra Session, pp. 124, 129, regardless of the validity vel non of the Sparks Amendment, Const.Amend.No.26A, art. 24, see Gen.Acts 1933, Ex.Sess., p. 46. He has, therefore, no disqualifying interest in a cause pending in his court wherein the va lidity of such amendment is presented as an issue.
Mandamus denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.