Riner v. State
Riner v. State
1 So. 2d 403; 241 Ala. 166; 1941 Ala. LEXIS 335
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Riner v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant on his trial, though represented by counsel, failed to reserve any question of law for review on appeal, and the Court of Appeals, pretermits consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge, and correctly so. McPherson v. State, 198 Ala. 5, 73 So. 387.
The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.