Appellant sued appellee for a divorce. The facts on which relief was sought were denied and contested by appellee. The proof was taken ore tenus in open court and in the presence of the trial judge. A decree was rendered denying relief, but *35awarding the custody of their child to appellee and providing for an allowance to be paid for its support, and for an attorney’s fee.

Upon a consideration of the evidence in the light of the applicable presumptions, we think the decree should not be disturbed but affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.