Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959

Erwin v. Erwin

Erwin v. Erwin
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided October 8, 1959 · Merrill, Lawson, Stakely, Goodwyn, Coleman
269 Ala. 632; 114 So. 2d 918; 1959 Ala. LEXIS 566

Erwin v. Erwin

Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

There being no assignment of error “bound with the transcript,” an order of affirmance is due to be entered, and it is so ordered. Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix; Crim v. Gilbert, 267 Ala. 665, 104 So.2d 632; Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; Stidham v. Stidham, 264 Ala. 195, 86 So.2d 294; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639, and Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.