Bradford v. Engelhardt

Supreme Court of Alabama
Bradford v. Engelhardt, 276 Ala. 201 (Ala. 1964)
160 So. 2d 485; 1964 Ala. LEXIS 297
Livingston, Lawson, Goodwyn, Coleman

Bradford v. Engelhardt

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (plaintiff below) voluntarily took a nonsuit with bill of exceptions in his suit filed in the Circuit Court of Blount County after the ¡court sustained defendant’s demurrers to each count of the complaint.

*202The judgment entry on the non-suit, which is set out in the report of the case does not contain all the essentials of a final judgment necessary to support an appeal to obtain the review authorized by § 819, Title 7, Code of Alabama 1940. Mason v. McClain, 271 Ala. 93, 122 So.2d 519.

In the absence of a final judgment meeting the mandates of law, there is nothing for this court to review.

The matter is jurisdictional. It cannot be waived: We must dismiss the appeal ex mero motu; and it is so ordered by the court. Martin v. Alabama Power Company, 208 Ala. 212, 94 So. 76; Lathrop Lumber Company v. Pioneer Lumber Company, 207 Ala. 522, 93 So. 427.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by !B: W. SIMMONS, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, and was adopted by the court as its ■opinion.

- Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN, and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
C. M. Bradford v. Sam Engelhardt, Highway Director.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published