Supreme Court of Alabama, 1968

Nixon v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided January 18, 1968 · Goodwyn, Lawson, Coleman, Har-Wood

281 Ala. 632; 206 So. 2d 877; 1968 Ala. LEXIS 1251

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Metzger Brothers, Inc. v. Friedman (Ala. 1971)
Groves v. Segars (Ala. 1972)
State v. Argo-Collier Truck Lines Corporation (Ala. 1970)
Kinsaul v. Florala Telephone Company (Ala. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

GOODWYN, Justice.

Appellee has moved for affirmance of the judgment appealed from on the ground *633that “the appellant’s brief does not contain a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form under the heading, ‘Statement of the Facts,’ which would enable the Court to determine whether the Court below decided the case correctly under the law and the evidence,” as required by Rule 9(b) of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 279 Ala. XXIII, XXVI.

The motion is well-taken, and the judgment is due to be affirmed. See: Employers Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc. v. Watkins, 280 Ala. 681, 198 So.2d 258; Bolton v. Barnett Lumber & Supply Company, 267 Ala. 74, 100 So.2d 9, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, COLEMAN, and HAR-WOOD, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.