Gould v. Gould
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Thompson v. Thompson (Ala. Civ. App. 1975)
- Roberson v. Roberson (Ala. Civ. App. 1979)
- Sherrod v. Sherrod (Ala. Civ. App. 1978)
- Frazier v. Frazier (Ala. Civ. App. 1977)
- Rogers v. Rogers (Ala. Civ. App. 1977)
- Quintanilla v. George (Ala. Civ. App. 1976)
- Smith v. Smith (Ala. Civ. App. 1984)
- Robertson v. Robertson (Ala. Civ. App. 1982)
- Nesmith v. Nesmith (Ala. Civ. App. 1982)
- Cheatham v. Cheatham (Ala. Civ. App. 1981)
- Anonymous v. Anonymous (Ala. Civ. App. 1977)
- Brown v. Brown (Ala. Civ. App. 1977)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In re Linda GOULD
v.
Arthur GOULD.
Ex parte Arthur GOULD.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
W.C. McCain, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.
George W. Nichols, Jr., Tuscaloosa, for respondent.
*215 EMBRY, Justice.
Writ denied.
HEFLIN, C.J., and MERRILL, BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON and SHORES, JJ., concur.
MADDOX, J., concurs specially.
MADDOX, Justice (concurring specially):
I concur in denying the writ solely because our review on certiorari, is limited, generally, to questions of law. By agreeing to deny certiorari, however, I do not wish to be understood as agreeing that the Court of Civil Appeals made correct findings of fact, or that the Court, by dicta in its opinion, correctly stated what is, or should be, the Alabama law in custody fights, when the evidence shows that the party having custody of a child of tender years is living openly in a state of sexual immorality.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.