Estes v. State
Cases that cite this one
34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ex Parte Reed (Ala. 1986)
- Sanders v. City of Birmingham (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)
- Lum v. City of Brewton (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
- Malone v. City of Silverhill (Ala. Crim. App. 1989)
- Vizzina v. City of Birmingham (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- Mester v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
- Ex Parte Mayo (Ala. 1994)
- Mayo v. City of Madison (Ala. 1994)
- Harris v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
- Kolmetz v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)
- Weaver v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)
- Davis v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)
- Mayes v. City of Irondale (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
- Ex Parte Vizzina (Ala. 1988)
- Lunceford v. City of Northport (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)
- Vizzina v. City of Birmingham (Ala. 1988)
- Pate v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- Baker v. City of Huntsville (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- Jemison v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- Ex Parte Curtis (Ala. 1986)
- Nagem v. City of Phenix City (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Curtis v. City of Sheffield (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Curtis v. City of Sheffield (Ala. 1986)
- State v. Nelson (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985)
- Reeves v. City of Montgomery (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied because the admission of the ordinance is not a prerequisite to admission of the results of the PEI test. In denying this writ, we point out that we do not necessarily agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals' holding on "harmless error." Nor, do we agree that inPatton v. City of Decatur,
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.