Supreme Court of Alabama, 1980

Ex Parte Hubbard

Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided March 7, 1980 · Faulkner

382 So. 2d 597 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Ex Parte Arthur (Ala. 1985)
Rocker v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
Hubbard v. Haley (11th Cir. 2003)
Gavin v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
Jolly v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2002)
Smith v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2000)
Bryant v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Bryant v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
Arthur v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1996)
Land v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)
Carroll v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
Hubbard v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1991)
Cain v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
Morgan v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
Hubbard v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
Nelson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
Jones v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1985)
Jackson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1984)
Arthur v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1984)
Julius v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
Hoppins v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
Lokos v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1982)
Ex Parte Hubbard (Ala. 1981)
State v. Spurlock (Ala. Crim. App. 1981)
Hubbard v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

J.B. Hubbard was indicted for murder pursuant to Code 1975, § 13-11-2 (a)(13), as he had previously been convicted of second degree murder within twenty years, was found guilty by a jury in Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, and was sentenced to die by electrocution. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hubbard v. State, [MS, May 1, 1979] 382 So.2d 577 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979). This Court granted certiorari to review the conviction, pursuant to ARAP 39 (c), as this case involves the death penalty.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the additional facts presented in Hubbard's ARAP 39 (k) motion. We find the conviction is adequately supported by the evidence, and we agree with the reasoning of the Court of Criminal Appeals on all issues.

The Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, ALMON, SHORES, EMBRY and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

BLOODWORTH, J., not sitting. *Page 598

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.