Ex Parte Watson
Ex Parte Watson
398 So. 2d 332
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Ex Parte Watson
Opinion
The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition,
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.