Ex Parte Lewis
Ex Parte Lewis
414 So. 2d 140
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Deutcsh v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
- Patterson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1988)
- Nichols v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Snyder v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 2003)
- Harris v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)
- Salter v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
- Bankhead v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1990)
- Lauderdale v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1989)
- Creech v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- Patterson v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1987)
- McCall v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Hodges v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Williams v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Hodges v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Hayes v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1986)
- Wyllie v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
- Inzer v. State (Ala. Crim. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The only question presented by the petition for writ of certiorari is whether the witness, Cross, is an accomplice as a matter of law. The writ will not issue because the Court of Criminal Appeals has reached the right result,
WRIT DENIED.
TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, EMBRY and ADAMS, JJ., concur. *Page 141
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.