Diaz v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Diaz v. State, 474 So. 2d 173 (Ala. 1985)
1985 Ala. LEXIS 4055
Faulkner, Jones, Almon, Adams, Torbert
Diaz v. State
Opinion of the Court
WRIT DENIED.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I agree that the writ should be denied. However, I wish to point out that I do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion that the factual statement of the disciplinary court is ■ inadequate. I agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion, 474 So.2d 171, that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in circuit court on the merits of his allegations only because he was allegedly denied an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses at the disciplinary hearing.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ex Parte State of Alabama (Re Ignacio Diaz v. State of Alabama).
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published