Diaz v. State
Diaz v. State
474 So. 2d 173; 1985 Ala. LEXIS 4055
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Diaz v. State
Opinion of the Court
WRIT DENIED.
Concurring Opinion
(concurring specially).
I agree that the writ should be denied. However, I wish to point out that I do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion that the factual statement of the disciplinary court is ■ inadequate. I agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion, 474 So.2d 171, that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in circuit court on the merits of his allegations only because he was allegedly denied an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses at the disciplinary hearing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.