Diaz v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Diaz v. State, 474 So. 2d 173 (Ala. 1985)
1985 Ala. LEXIS 4055
Faulkner, Jones, Almon, Adams, Torbert

Diaz v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED.

FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, and ADAMS, JJ., concur. TORBERT, C.J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

TORBERT, Chief Justice

(concurring specially).

I agree that the writ should be denied. However, I wish to point out that I do not agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion that the factual statement of the disciplinary court is ■ inadequate. I agree with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ conclusion, 474 So.2d 171, that petitioner was entitled to a hearing in circuit court on the merits of his allegations only because he was allegedly denied an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses at the disciplinary hearing.

Reference

Full Case Name
Ex Parte State of Alabama (Re Ignacio Diaz v. State of Alabama).
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published