Arnold v. Arnold
Arnold v. Arnold
Opinion of the Court
This is a pro se appeal
The record before us is incomplete, and the appellant’s brief is inadequate, but apparently the appellant is claiming that he had a statutory right to intervene in the wrongful death action filed by his wife as administratrix.
AFFIRMED.
. "[A]n order denying intervention as of right is appealable.” Thrasher v. Bartlett, 424 So.2d 605, 607 (Ala. 1982).
. The pleadings are not included in the record, but the order appealed from reads, in part, as follows:
"This is a civil action to collect damages from several defendants for their alleged negligence or breach of warranty. The action was begun by the mother on behalf of her deceased son’s estate.
******
"IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS:
******
"4. That the petition of Melvin Arnold to intervene in this action as a party plaintiff is denied.”
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Melvin ARNOLD, Sr. v. Rachel ARNOLD, as administratrix of the estate of Melvin Arnold, Jr.
- Status
- Published