Armstrong v. Roger's Outdoor Sports, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
27 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama Power (Ala. 1993)
- K.M. v. G.H. (Ala. Civ. App. 1995)
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson (Ala. 1996)
- Bozeman v. Busby (Ala. 1994)
- Horton Homes, Inc. v. Brooks (Ala. 2001)
- Ex Parte Jefferson County (Ala. 2000)
- State v. CM (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
- State v. C.M. (Ala. Crim. App. 1999)
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. Johnson (Ala. 1997)
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore (Ala. 1997)
- Bratton v. City of Florence (Ala. 1996)
- Sperau v. Ford Motor Co. (Ala. 1995)
- Ray v. ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF MOBILE (Ala. 1995)
- Crump v. Alabama Alcoholic Control Board (Ala. Civ. App. 1995)
- Ex Parte Giles (Ala. 1994)
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Harris (Ala. 1994)
- INDEPENDENT LIFE & ACC. INS. CO. v. Harrington (Ala. 1994)
- Independent Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Harrington (Ala. 1994)
- Enstar Group, Inc. v. Grassgreen (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1993)
- UNION MORTG. CO., INC. v. Barlow (Ala. 1992)
- Smith v. States General Life Ins. Co. (Ala. 1992)
- Intercontinental Life Ins. Co. v. Lindblom (Ala. 1992)
- Empire Gas, Inc. of Belle Mina v. Cartwright (Ala. 1992)
- Toole v. McClintock (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1991)
- Armstrong v. Roger's Outdoor Sports (Ala. 1991)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this appeal, Armstrong challenges the constitutionality of Ala.Code 1975, §§ 6-11-23 and -24. Armstrong did not comply with the provisions of § 6-6-227, which requires, as a jurisdictional matter, that a party provide notice to the attorney general of Alabama of a challenge to a statute. Guy v. Southwest Alabama Council on Alcoholism, 475 So.2d 1190 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Fairhope Single Tax Corp. v. Rezner, 527 So.2d 1232 (Ala. 1987); Wallace v. State, 507 So.2d 466 (Ala. 1987) (per four Justices, with Torbert, C.J., concurring in the result); Barger v. Barger, 410 So.2d 17 (Ala. 1982).
Accordingly, although a portion of the issues raised by the appellant are properly before us, we decline to rule on those issues until the constitutional challenges are properly presented. The cause is remanded for the appellant, pursuant to § 6-6-227, to notify the attorney general of his challenge within 90 days of this remand. The appellant may then resubmit to this Court his constitutional arguments, as well as other arguments.
REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.