Arthur v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Arthur v. State, 575 So. 2d 1191 (Ala. 1991)
1991 WL 32293
Per Curiam
Arthur v. State
Opinion
Ex parte State of Alabama.
(Re Thomas Douglas ARTHUR
v.
STATE).
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Andy S. Poole and William D. Little, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.
William Hovater, Tuscumbia, and H. Alan Gargis, Muscle Shoals, for respondent.
Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 575 So.2d 1165.
PER CURIAM.
WRIT DENIED.
HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent.
HOUSTON, Justice (dissenting).
I think that this case is distinguishable from Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675, 108 S.Ct. 2093, 100 L.Ed.2d 704 (1988). I would reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
STEAGALL, J., concurs.
Reference
- Cited By
- 26 cases
- Status
- Published